OFF-GUARDIAN.ORG -- The World Health Organization released a memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds used on COVID-19 PCR tests will result in false positives. Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. It's been commonly available knowledge, for months now. Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn't meant as a diagnostic tool, saying: "with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody." Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting "dead nucleotides", not a living virus. So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could ...

Click to view ❯❯❯

RT.COM -- A peer review by 22 international experts of the paper on which most COVID testing is based has comprehensively debunked the science behind it. They conclude the PCR test is utterly unsuitable as a means for diagnosis -- and the fall-out is immense. The original study, the Corman-Drosten paper, described a protocol for applying the PCR technique to detecting COVID, now used in around 70% of COVID kits worldwide. It was published by Eurosurveillance on January, 23, 2020, just one day after being submitted, which would make any peer review process that took place possibly the shortest in history. The PCR test is cheap, fast -- and absolutely useless. At least four authors of the original paper themselves have severe conflicts of interest. Two are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance! And at least three are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing! But wait -- it gets worse. As has been noted previously ...

Click to view ❯❯❯

OFF-GUARDIAN.ORG -- Imagine going to a doctor suspecting you have a serious illness and being told that there are 2 tests available. If you test positive with the first test they don't know whether or not you have the disease. And the second test, they know for certain is of no value in detecting the disease. Would you find that satisfactory? Obviously not. Yet that is exactly what the Australian government is admitting is the situation with its coronavirus testing. On their web site for health professionals they state that "the extent to which a positive PCR result correlates with the infectious state of an individual is still being determined" and that "there is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests." In other words, the health authorities do not know whether, if a person tests positive, they are infected or not. Yet testing positive is ...

Click to view ❯❯❯

THEBLAZE.COM -- [ISMAILI DIGEST ED: We are reposting this article (originally posted on 31 August 2020) due to new information, from WHO and others, re-confirming the PCR test used for COVID-19 diagnosis is virtually useless.] ARTICLE: In a bombshell weekend report, The New York Times reveals that most of the COVID-19 PCR tests are likely creating thousands upon thousands of false positives or flagging people with tiny quantities of virus who are not contagious. According to the Times, up to 90% of those who test positive in state labs would test negative under more prudent lab protocols. This is not new. The New York Times wrote about this exact flaw in PCR tests in 2007 when, in New Hampshire, the tests had a 100% false positive rate and fuelled the perception of a whooping cough epidemic that never existed. But the false positive rate might be even worse. One study published by Oxford University Press found absolutely no viral growth from samples with a CT above ...

Click to view ❯❯❯

OFF-GUARDIAN.ORG -- [ISMAILI DIGEST ED: We are reposting this article (originally posted on 31 August 2020) due to new information, from WHO and others, re-confirming the PCR test used for COVID-19 diagnosis is virtually useless.] ARTICLE: Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to "diagnose" Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose. Although Kary Mullis, who invented PCR technology, that also earned him the 1993 Nobel prize in chemistry, passed last year, there is no doubt that he regarded the PCR as inappropriate viral infection test because PCR is a manufacturing technique, not a diagnostic tool to detect viruses. COVID-19 PCR tests do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with, as Jessica C. Watson confirmed in her British Medical Journal paper "Interpreting a COVID-19 test result." For that, we need to know the PCR tests were calibrated particle purified RNA. We asked several study authors "Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?" But not a single team could answer that question with "yes." Nobody said purification ...

Click to view ❯❯❯

[H/T MOHIB EBRAHIM] -- WMBRIGGS.COM -- [ISMAILI DIGEST ED: Hazar Imam, 2008: "Freedom doesn't mean that if you want to abuse that freedom, whatever it is, you legitimise or impose that on others." "We do not ask [others] to share all our ethics, nor should they ask us to share all theirs."] ARTICLE: "The Separation," at the American Mind, suggests the people of the gods go one way, and the people of God go another. However, the people of the gods will never allow it, for they see themselves progressing toward some Great Future in which there is perfect diversity and equality -- by which they mean utter conformity, where disbelief and apostasy is forbidden by law. They say morality is changeable and, paradoxically, individual interpretation. What they say comes into existence, not in reality, but just that they insist everyone admit it is real. The people of God are the opposite. They see morality as fixed, suffering is accepted as part of life, and not always some other person's fault. They say what is spoken by God comes into existence, and into Reality, that life is best when Reality is admitted, and ...

Click to view ❯❯❯